One of our latest projects involved archetypal notions of an American talk show. Its variations were based on the surreal perception that these shows are of importance. Not long ago the news, comedy circuits, opinion polls, coffee shop topics, et cetera, were filled with discussions about talk show hosts and whom should hold which time slot. The network giants were basically figuring out contracts and moving around people to get one monologue crew versus another one. We actually do not have a television. Not as a statement, at least not anymore for we watch plenty of television based programs online, but more as an example of its dinosaur characteristics. Television, as a notion, is a phenomenon of the past. Granted we lived through the height of it much like we heard stories of family gatherings around a radio. Living in NYC does not really require the wind down with the typical shows. There is no time. Sure we try to catch a game here and there, stay in touch with a series or show. But the basic premise has shifted. We have become an on demand crowd. We watch what we want, not what is there, what they give us. As thought thinkers, the prototype shows hold only enough substance for cultural criticism, observation. We do have favorites, some follow the hip pool, some are outside the norm. Talk shows do not really touch our vision scope. These fall under an even more dinasouric category. The formula is not unique enough to hold our attention. Perhaps we have outgrown their grasp, perhaps we were too young to understand them to get into them and now we are too late. Adding to our opinion would be the cultural differences and not growing up with these shows in other countries. New York versus Los Angeles, 10:30 opposed to 11:30. These arguments might only serve as entertainment for the generation that grew up watching these programs. Not that this is a bad thing; we mention this to point out our lack of understanding of this culture, experience.
As we broke it down, the talk show example is simple. The host begins with a joke or two, mostly topical and/or political. The next phase is a comedy skit that keeps the audience laughing and clapping. The whole notion of a live audience serves as cue to people watching at home; was this funny, should we laugh, et cetera. Later comes a guest, usually an actor or someone with a current show or movie to promote. The interview normally brings the actor to a level in which the audience can identify with and/or laugh with. A musical guest appears next with a number from a previous record or a current one in order to support their concert, t-shirt, or to break up the monotony of people talking about relevant topics. Sometimes comics get interviewed or share their own monologue. To wrap up the show there is a musical number. The whole late night talk show experience is not complete without a series of commercials that promote all sorts of other products or services that appeal to the audience at home but that might not be related to what is being promoted on the show. There is a sense, for us newbies, that this just promotes and serves itself. For the most part we are not aware of what most of these people have accomplished, perhaps not as an element of value. Though we might identify with the younger talk host generation, their main importance comes from being on television, which we have already denounced as passé. Parents have cable.
Last year we participated in a play by Pass Kontrol: New Hope City. A Character was created as a talk show host from a proposed utopian future. Sexo the Clown is a bit of a nom de guerre, or nom de plum, that has been around since the messenger days; as well as a publication of art works and photographs. Perhaps not the best name for the spirit of the talk show, but it suited the future quality of the play. This also wandered from the name and last name principal of most talk shows. After a full run of the play, Sexo had a persona of its own. In order to explore a little bit further and with a bit of reach, we revived the role with a full show: The Sexo The Clown Show. We followed the basic breakdown, had a house band, a sidekick and guests. There was even a cameraperson and his assistant to drive the televised concept home. One of the major differences was the treatment of language. Though the main intent was the original thought of language being obsolete in the future, there was also a mood that, for the most part, guests speak nonsense and bring nothing of intellectual value to the table. Their main concern is to promote themselves, their movie, idea, product, or latest publication. As a side note, though we were speaking in a few different languages, after the run we began to understand each other. Dancing girls, The Shy Grrrls, provided a relationship with talk shows from other countries. Sound bites made a bit of a crossover with morning radio. Also, a curated set of commercials gave the audience a break from the inner workings of the show. Overall, the half written, half improvised production drove the point across. The players were devoted to their characters and remained on point. It was a three-night run with a closing event at the end. We could not have accomplished this project without people collaborating and pitching in. One of the coolest things, as usual, is the fact that we pulled it off… Because we could…
A special place is set aside for all those involved, Pass Kontrol, Bed Credit/No Credit, Spring(s), as well as The Bushwick Starr. They provided well-needed courage, support, and a drink or two, maybe three…






































































































































































































































